Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Fostering innovation in U.S. law enforcement : identifying high-priority technology and other needs for improving law enforcement operations and outcomes / John S. Hollywood, Dulani Woods, Sean E. Goodison, Andrew Lauland, Lisa Wagner, Thomas J. Wilson, Brian A. Jackson.

By: Hollywood, John S, 1973- [author.].
Contributor(s): National Institute of Justice (U.S.) [sponsoring body.] | Priority Criminal Justice Needs Initiative [sponsoring body.] | Police Executive Research Forum | RTI International.
Material type: TextTextPublisher: Santa Monica, Calif. : RAND Corporation, [2017]Copyright date: ©2017Description: xv, 135 pages : illustrations (chiefly color) ; 28 cm.Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 0833098470; 9780833098474.Other title: Fostering innovation in United States law enforcement | Identifying high-priority technology and other needs for improving law enforcement operations and outcomes.Subject(s): Law enforcement -- Technological innovations -- United States -- 21st century | Electronics in crime prevention | Police -- Technological innovations -- United States -- 21st century | Police -- United States -- Equipment and supplies -- 21st centuryDDC classification: 363.20973
Contents:
Introduction -- The State of U.S. Law Enforcement Today -- Law Enforcement Technology and Practice Today -- From Law Enforcement Today to Law Enforcement Tomorrow: Identifying and Prioritizing Innovation Needs in Technology, Policy, and Practice -- Conclusions -- Appendix A: LEAP 2 Members -- Appendix B: Pre-Meeting Questionnaire -- Appendix C: Panel Agenda -- Appendix D: Detailed Methodology -- Appendix E: Full Law Enforcement Technology Taxonomy -- Appendix F: Full List of Needs from LEAP 2.
Summary: The National Institute of Justice tasked RAND to host a panel of law enforcement experts to identify high-priority needs for innovation in law enforcement, covering advances in technology, policy, and practice. The needs discussed in this report can help prioritize research, development, and dissemination efforts in ways that will provide the greatest value to law enforcement practitioners. The panel identified four top findings. First, there is a need to improve practitioners' knowledge of available research and technology, starting with a central knowledge repository and research on how to improve dissemination and training methods. Second, there is a need for practices and technologies to improve police-community relations, both to improve encounters with the public and to improve community relations more broadly. Third, there is a need to improve the sharing and use of information in a range of ways. These include means to get crime analysis capabilities to all agencies (including small and disadvantaged agencies), software development to reduce information overload, and model proposal and contract language to make systems interoperable. Fourth, there is a need to reduce backlogs in forensic processing; panelists suggested broadening U.S. Department of Justice forensic grants outside of DNA to help address the backlogs. Additional high-priority needs included further development of policies and use cases for unmanned aerial vehicles, best practices for selecting and using personal gear, and improving defenses against active shooters. The latter included improving both suspicious activity reporting processes and efforts to educate the public on responding to an active shooter. There is also a need for a review of technologies that might improve officers' health.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Item type Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
Book University of Texas At Tyler
Stacks - 3rd Floor
HV7936.E7 H65 2017 (Browse shelf) Available 0000002331858

"RR-1814-NIJ"--Back cover.

"Priority Criminal Justice Needs Initiative, a project of the RAND Corporation, the Police Executive Research Forum, RTI International, and the University of Denver."

"Sponsored by the National Institute of Justice."

Includes bibliographical references (pages 125-135).

Introduction -- The State of U.S. Law Enforcement Today -- Law Enforcement Technology and Practice Today -- From Law Enforcement Today to Law Enforcement Tomorrow: Identifying and Prioritizing Innovation Needs in Technology, Policy, and Practice -- Conclusions -- Appendix A: LEAP 2 Members -- Appendix B: Pre-Meeting Questionnaire -- Appendix C: Panel Agenda -- Appendix D: Detailed Methodology -- Appendix E: Full Law Enforcement Technology Taxonomy -- Appendix F: Full List of Needs from LEAP 2.

The National Institute of Justice tasked RAND to host a panel of law enforcement experts to identify high-priority needs for innovation in law enforcement, covering advances in technology, policy, and practice. The needs discussed in this report can help prioritize research, development, and dissemination efforts in ways that will provide the greatest value to law enforcement practitioners. The panel identified four top findings. First, there is a need to improve practitioners' knowledge of available research and technology, starting with a central knowledge repository and research on how to improve dissemination and training methods. Second, there is a need for practices and technologies to improve police-community relations, both to improve encounters with the public and to improve community relations more broadly. Third, there is a need to improve the sharing and use of information in a range of ways. These include means to get crime analysis capabilities to all agencies (including small and disadvantaged agencies), software development to reduce information overload, and model proposal and contract language to make systems interoperable. Fourth, there is a need to reduce backlogs in forensic processing; panelists suggested broadening U.S. Department of Justice forensic grants outside of DNA to help address the backlogs. Additional high-priority needs included further development of policies and use cases for unmanned aerial vehicles, best practices for selecting and using personal gear, and improving defenses against active shooters. The latter included improving both suspicious activity reporting processes and efforts to educate the public on responding to an active shooter. There is also a need for a review of technologies that might improve officers' health.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.