Success and Failure in Limited War : Information and Strategy in the Korean, Vietnam, Persian Gulf, and Iraq WarsMaterial type: TextSeries: eBooks on DemandPublisher: Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2014Description: 1 online resource (344 p.)ISBN: 9780226107851Subject(s): Iraq War, 2003-2011 | Korean War, 1950-1953 | Persian Gulf War, 1991 | United States -- History, Military -- 20th century | United States -- History, Military -- 21st century | Vietnam War, 1961-1975Genre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Success and Failure in Limited War : Information and Strategy in the Korean, Vietnam, Persian Gulf, and Iraq WarsDDC classification: 355.00973 LOC classification: E745 .B35 2014Online resources: Click here to view this ebook.
|Item type||Current location||Call number||URL||Status||Date due||Barcode|
|Electronic Book||UT Tyler Online Online||E745 .B35 2014 (Browse shelf)||http://uttyler.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1639068||Available||EBL1639068|
Contents; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter One: Information Institutions and Strategy in War; Chapter Two: Explaining Strategic Performance in Limited Warfare; Chapter Three: Military and Diplomatic Defeat in the Korean War; Chapter Four: The Vietnam War, Little Consolation; Chapter Five: Military and Diplomatic Success in the Persian Gulf War; Chapter Six: Iraq - Win the Battle, Lose the War; Chapter Seven: Information Institutions Matter!; Notes; Bibliography; Index
Common and destructive, limited wars are significant international events that pose a number of challenges to the states involved beyond simple victory or defeat. Chief among these challenges is the risk of escalation-be it in the scale, scope, cost, or duration of the conflict. In this book, Spencer D. Bakich investigates a crucial and heretofore ignored factor in determining the nature and direction of limited war: information institutions.Traditional assessments of wartime strategy focus on the relationship between the military and civilians, but Bakich argues that we must take into account
Description based upon print version of record.