Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Qualifying times : points of change in U.S. women's sport / Jaime Schultz.

By: Schultz, Jaime [author.].
Material type: TextTextSeries: JSTOR eBooks.Sport and society: Publisher: Urbana : University of Illinois Press, [2014]Copyright date: ©2014Description: 1 online resource (xiv, 280 pages).Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9781461958130; 146195813X; 9780252095962; 0252095960.Subject(s): Sports for women -- United States -- History | Sports for women -- Social aspects -- United States | Women athletes -- United States -- HistoryAdditional physical formats: Print version:: Qualifying times.DDC classification: 796.082 Online resources: Click here to view this ebook.
Contents:
Introduction: the politics of the ponytail -- What shall we wear for tennis? -- Commercial tampons and the sportswoman, 1936-52 -- Rules, rulers, and the "right kind" of competition -- Women's sport and questionable sex -- From "women in sports" to the "new ideal of beauty" -- A cultural history of the sports bra -- Something to cheer about? -- Epilogue: cheering with reserve.
Summary: This perceptive, lively study explores U.S. women's sport through historical "points of change": particular products or trends that dramatically influenced both women's participation in sport and cultural responses to women athletes. Beginning with the seemingly innocent ponytail, the subject of the Introduction, scholar Jaime Schultz challenges the reader to look at the historical and sociological significance of now-common items such as sports bras and tampons and ideas such as sex testing and competitive cheerleading. Tennis wear, tampons, and sports bras all facilitated women{u2019}s participation in physical culture, while physical educators, the aesthetic fitness movement, and Title IX encouraged women to challenge (or confront) policy, financial, and cultural obstacles. While some of these points of change increased women's physical freedom and sporting participation, they also posed challenges. Tampons encouraged menstrual shame, sex testing (a tool never used with male athletes) perpetuated narrowly-defined cultural norms of femininity, and the late-twentieth-century aesthetic fitness movement fed into an unrealistic beauty ideal. Ultimately, Schultz finds that U.S. women's sport has progressed significantly but ambivalently. Although participation in sports is no longer uncommon for girls and women, Schultz argues that these "points of change" have contributed to a complex matrix of gender differentiation that marks the female athletic body as different than--as less than--the male body, despite the advantages it may confer.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Item type Current location Call number URL Status Date due Barcode
Electronic Book UT Tyler Online
Online
GV709.18.U6 S38 2014 (Browse shelf) https://ezproxy.uttyler.edu/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/j.ctt5vk0cg Available ocn871039990

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Introduction: the politics of the ponytail -- What shall we wear for tennis? -- Commercial tampons and the sportswoman, 1936-52 -- Rules, rulers, and the "right kind" of competition -- Women's sport and questionable sex -- From "women in sports" to the "new ideal of beauty" -- A cultural history of the sports bra -- Something to cheer about? -- Epilogue: cheering with reserve.

Print version record.

This perceptive, lively study explores U.S. women's sport through historical "points of change": particular products or trends that dramatically influenced both women's participation in sport and cultural responses to women athletes. Beginning with the seemingly innocent ponytail, the subject of the Introduction, scholar Jaime Schultz challenges the reader to look at the historical and sociological significance of now-common items such as sports bras and tampons and ideas such as sex testing and competitive cheerleading. Tennis wear, tampons, and sports bras all facilitated women{u2019}s participation in physical culture, while physical educators, the aesthetic fitness movement, and Title IX encouraged women to challenge (or confront) policy, financial, and cultural obstacles. While some of these points of change increased women's physical freedom and sporting participation, they also posed challenges. Tampons encouraged menstrual shame, sex testing (a tool never used with male athletes) perpetuated narrowly-defined cultural norms of femininity, and the late-twentieth-century aesthetic fitness movement fed into an unrealistic beauty ideal. Ultimately, Schultz finds that U.S. women's sport has progressed significantly but ambivalently. Although participation in sports is no longer uncommon for girls and women, Schultz argues that these "points of change" have contributed to a complex matrix of gender differentiation that marks the female athletic body as different than--as less than--the male body, despite the advantages it may confer.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.