Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Paying the human costs of war : American public opinion and casualties in military conflicts / Christopher Gelpi, Peter D. Feaver, Jason Reifler.

By: Gelpi, Christopher, 1966-.
Contributor(s): Feaver, Peter | Reifler, Jason Aaron, 1972-.
Material type: TextTextSeries: JSTOR eBooks.Publisher: Princeton ; Oxford : Princeton University Press, ©2009Description: 1 online resource (xiv, 289 pages) : illustrations.Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9781400830091; 1400830095.Subject(s): War casualties -- United States -- Public opinion | War and society -- United States | Public opinion -- United StatesAdditional physical formats: Print version:: Paying the human costs of war.DDC classification: 320 Online resources: Click here to view this ebook.
Contents:
Theories of American attitudes toward warfare -- America's tolerance for casualties, 1950-2006 -- Measuring individual attitudes toward military conflict -- Experimental evidence on attitudes toward military conflict -- Individual attitudes toward the Iraq War, 2003-2004 -- Iraq the vote: war and the presidential election of 2004 -- The sources and meaning of success in Iraq -- Conclusion.
Action note: digitized 2010 committed to preserveSummary: "From the Korean War to the current conflict in Iraq, Paying the Human Costs of War examines the ways in which the American public decides whether to support the use of military force. Contrary to the conventional view, the authors demonstrate that the public does not respond reflexively and solely to the number of casualties in a conflict. Instead, the book argues that the public makes reasoned and reasonable cost-benefit calculations for their continued support of a war based on the justifications for it and the likelihood it will succeed, along with the costs that have been suffered in casualties. Of these factors, the book finds that the most important consideration for the public is the expectation of success. If the public believes that a mission will succeed, the public will support it even if the costs are high. When the public does not expect the mission to succeed, even small costs will cause the withdrawal of support"--Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Item type Current location Call number URL Status Date due Barcode
Electronic Book UT Tyler Online
Online
UA23 .G535 2009 (Browse shelf) https://ezproxy.uttyler.edu/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7snhn Available ocn659199593

Includes bibliographical references (pages 265-282) and index.

Theories of American attitudes toward warfare -- America's tolerance for casualties, 1950-2006 -- Measuring individual attitudes toward military conflict -- Experimental evidence on attitudes toward military conflict -- Individual attitudes toward the Iraq War, 2003-2004 -- Iraq the vote: war and the presidential election of 2004 -- The sources and meaning of success in Iraq -- Conclusion.

"From the Korean War to the current conflict in Iraq, Paying the Human Costs of War examines the ways in which the American public decides whether to support the use of military force. Contrary to the conventional view, the authors demonstrate that the public does not respond reflexively and solely to the number of casualties in a conflict. Instead, the book argues that the public makes reasoned and reasonable cost-benefit calculations for their continued support of a war based on the justifications for it and the likelihood it will succeed, along with the costs that have been suffered in casualties. Of these factors, the book finds that the most important consideration for the public is the expectation of success. If the public believes that a mission will succeed, the public will support it even if the costs are high. When the public does not expect the mission to succeed, even small costs will cause the withdrawal of support"--Provided by publisher.

Print version record.

Use copy Restrictions unspecified star MiAaHDL

Electronic reproduction. [S.l.] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010. MiAaHDL

Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. MiAaHDL

http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212

digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve pda MiAaHDL

Reviews provided by Syndetics

CHOICE Review

Gelpi and Feaver (both, Duke Univ.), and Reifler (Georgia State Univ.) have produced a most fascinating volume on the human costs of waging war. They set out to understand under what conditions Americans would support their leaders' decisions to use military force. Their analysis of five military operations--Korea, Vietnam, Lebanon, Somalia, and Kosovo--indicates that the most important factor was the public's expectation that the military operation would be successful. This factor trumped all others--concern over casualties, stakes, costs (both human and financial), the trustworthiness of the administration, and the degree of public consensus on the foreign policy goal in question. Relying on nearly 9,000 surveys conducted between October 2003 and November 2004, this study demolishes the work done by John Mueller in War, Presidents, and Public Opinion (1973), which concluded that as casualties mount, public support drops correspondingly. This study also sought to answer the additional question of whether or not the US public would vote to reelect a president who had led the nation into a costly war. Their conclusion was that the public would vote to reelect if the initial decision to start the war was perceived to be correct. Well researched and thoughtfully written. Summing Up: Essential. General readers, all undergraduate students, and graduate students. W. K. Hall Bradley University

Author notes provided by Syndetics

Christopher Gelpi is professor of political science at Duke University. He is the author of The Power of Legitimacy (Princeton). Peter D. Feaver is the Alexander F. Hehmeyer Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at Duke University. From 2005 to 2007, he served as a special advisor on the National Security Council. Feaver and Gelpi are the coauthors of Choosing Your Battles (Princeton). Jason Reifler is assistant professor of political science at Georgia State University.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.