Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Bound by Our Constitution : Women, Workers, and the Minimum Wage

By: Hart, Vivien.
Material type: TextTextSeries: eBooks on Demand.Princeton Studies in American Politics: Historical, International, and Comparative Perspectives: Publisher: Princeton : Princeton University Press, 1994Description: 1 online resource (272 p.).ISBN: 9781400821563.Subject(s): Minimum wage -- Law and legislation -- Great Britain -- History | Minimum wage -- Law and legislation -- United States -- History | Sex discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- Great Britain -- History | Sex discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- United States -- History | Wages -- Women -- Law and legislation -- Great Britain -- History. Women -- Employment -- Great Britain -- History | Wages -- Women -- Law and legislation -- United States -- History | Women -- Employment -- United States -- HistoryGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Bound by Our Constitution : Women, Workers, and the Minimum WageDDC classification: 331.230973 | 344/.0121 Online resources: Click here to view this ebook.
Contents:
Book Cover; Title; Copyright; CONTENTS
Summary: What difference does a written constitution make to public policy? How have women workers fared in a nation bound by constitutional principles, compared with those not covered by formal, written guarantees of fair procedure or equitable outcome? To investigate these questions, Vivien Hart traces the evolution of minimum wage policies in the United States and Britain from their common origins in women''s politics around 1900 to their divergent outcomes in our day. She argues, contrary to common wisdom, that the advantage has been with the American constitutional system rather than the British. Basing her analysis on primary research, Hart reconstructs legal strategies and policy decisions that revolved around the recognition of women as workers and the public definition of gender roles. Contrasting seismic shifts and expansion in American minimum wage policy with indifference and eventual abolition in Britain, she challenges preconceptions about the constraints of American constitutionalism versus British flexibility. Though constitutional requirements did block and frustrate women''s attempts to gain fair wages, they also, as Hart demonstrates, created a terrain in the United States for principled debate about women, work, and the state--and a momentum for public policy--unparalleled in Britain. Hart''s book should be of interest to policy, labor, women''s, and legal historians, to political scientists, and to students of gender issues, law, and social policy.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Item type Current location Call number URL Status Date due Barcode
Electronic Book UT Tyler Online
Online
K1781 .H37 2001 | K1781.H37 (Browse shelf) http://uttyler.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=581604 Available EBL581604

Book Cover; Title; Copyright; CONTENTS

What difference does a written constitution make to public policy? How have women workers fared in a nation bound by constitutional principles, compared with those not covered by formal, written guarantees of fair procedure or equitable outcome? To investigate these questions, Vivien Hart traces the evolution of minimum wage policies in the United States and Britain from their common origins in women''s politics around 1900 to their divergent outcomes in our day. She argues, contrary to common wisdom, that the advantage has been with the American constitutional system rather than the British. Basing her analysis on primary research, Hart reconstructs legal strategies and policy decisions that revolved around the recognition of women as workers and the public definition of gender roles. Contrasting seismic shifts and expansion in American minimum wage policy with indifference and eventual abolition in Britain, she challenges preconceptions about the constraints of American constitutionalism versus British flexibility. Though constitutional requirements did block and frustrate women''s attempts to gain fair wages, they also, as Hart demonstrates, created a terrain in the United States for principled debate about women, work, and the state--and a momentum for public policy--unparalleled in Britain. Hart''s book should be of interest to policy, labor, women''s, and legal historians, to political scientists, and to students of gender issues, law, and social policy.

Description based upon print version of record.

Author notes provided by Syndetics

Vivien Hart is Reader in American Studies at the University of Sussex.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.